How Should Feyerabend have Defended Astrology? A Further Reply to Kidd, Massimo Pigliucci

Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective

Author Information: Massimo Pigliucci, City College of New York, massimo@platofootnote.org

Pigliucci, Massimo. “How Should Feyerabend have Defended Astrology? A Further Reply to Kidd.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5, no. 8 (2016): 10-16.

The PDF of the article gives specific page numbers. Shortlink: http://wp.me/p1Bfg0-38G

Please refer to:

zodiac

Image credit: Matthew Kirkland, via flickr

Ian Kidd (2016a) has written a compelling interpretation of Paul Feyerabend’s famous (or infamous, depending on one’s point of view) so-called defense of astrology (and homeopathy, and…

View original post 2,645 more words

Advertisements